🔗 Share this article

This is Black History Month in the UK, and it feels like it’s time for a re-evaluation. Throughout its history, an observance that started out as a commemorative event of the past, cultural identity and bonds between Black populations worldwide, has adopted a commercial tone, growing to encompass gatherings where African descendants are paid to talk to white audiences about “unconscious bias” and supportive partnership. The anti-racism rallies of the last decade created a surge in the business of displaying cultural sensitivity. However, that period has concluded. The surge has crested, resulting in a somewhat empty inheritance of what raising awareness is for.

The History of Black History Month

First commemorated in the United States and Canada, Black History Month was created in 1962 as a week dedicated to Negro history by African American historian Carter G. Woodson with multiple days of celebration and reflection in the middle of February. Black History Month grew out of this campaign and was formally inaugurated in 1970. Now it is celebrated not only in the United States and Canada in the second month, but also in the tenth month in the United Kingdom, Deutschland, Ireland and the the Kingdom of the Netherlands.

The observance has transformed since those days, placing less emphasis on the narratives of the slave trade across the Atlantic and struggles for equality, and greater focus on notable African descendants in politics, culture, and activism, and widely honoring the contribution Black people have made to influence the nation. It is in educational institutions where Black History Month is most frequently marked, with lectures and artistic activities. But the way the month is commemorated is a manifestation of the political moment. How it develops is a valuable example in how appropriation leads to dismantling: the reshaping of Black History Month has hindered the objective of it, which is to tackle systemic and institutional racism.

---

A Jarring Moment

Little demonstrates how critical it is to rethink Black History Month more than the specific period in which it occurs this year. In the Britain, a resurgent right in the guise of the Reform political group is ahead in surveys. In the recent season we saw the biggest extreme right demonstration in British history. the Conservative leader, the Black leader of the Conservative party, is a staunch adversary of the racial justice movement, and we are in a place where a elected representative gains confidence to say that a lack of white people in parts of a city is a cause for alarm. At the same time, far-right parties are expanding in the EU as a complete entity.

In the United States, a massive attack against diversity initiatives and positive discrimination has been taken, repeatedly with positive outcomes, to the supreme judicial bodies of the nation. A drive to erase Black history and experience from the historical documents is ongoing. One of Donald Trump's initial presidential directives targeted the institution dedicated to Black heritage, and the renowned cultural organization, claiming they of a coordinated and broad attempt to change the national past” by depicting the United States “as naturally discriminatory”.

In this context, the celebration illustrates how little it can be influential if it is confined to either dutiful corporate observances, or stripped of political content commemorations of historical achievements, rather than challenging the realities of the current era. It also demonstrates how its restricted time span means that it is separated from the broader ongoing work that is required. Denise Miller, a prof at a learning establishment, articulated it most accurately when she raised concerns about the fleeting superficial actions of the observance. “The problem with adopting a symbolic stance”, she commented, “is that it frequently results in that Black History Month turns into a brief show rather than a driver of transformation.”

---

Reconsidering, Not Discarding

Figuring out how to adapt, revise and extend actions for equal rights and acknowledgment in such times of discouragement and concern is a difficult task. There is a inclination to just discontinue events including Black History Month completely, believing they are simply not fit for purpose, or are remnants of an period that has failed to deliver.

Yet, in spite of all this, Black History Month, and in fact the complete comprehensive structure and heritage of activism for racial justice – community-based BLM initiatives, DEI programs, and yes, even those talks to businesses – form an infrastructure that a lot of work has gone into. It is there not merely to decline as the situation evolves (and in fact, declines), but to be a living breathing thing.

So what would a new dynamic Black History Month seem? Firstly, it would be extended beyond a brief observance: something that is spread out across all seasons (as some institutions are already beginning to do), sections of its curriculum (particularly around notable African descendants) incorporated into educational programs. It would also be a time that does not evade politics, and allows opportunity for individuals, particularly the younger generation, to express their concerns and stories. What purpose serves mere awareness of the history when it fails to address the contemporary truth of extreme conservative demonstrations in the street? Establishments who mark it should not be comforted with the non-confrontational words of “unconscious bias” and awareness of “microaggressions”, but faced with the threats that affect everyone if anti-racism is not taken seriously. Briefly stated, Black History Month should be made current, critical, and adaptive. Perhaps an complete renaming is in order – Present-Day African Heritage Celebration.